So I’m still struggling through the introduction of the PhD thesis I promised to read: understandable since the introduction is still going at page 50. In between my last post and this one I’ve had to wade through some sleep-inducing academic wank, but now I’ve got to the outline in the introduction of the importance of race, and its fluidity in cyberpunk.
The first thing to note, mentioned quite a bit in this article, is that Gibson had never been to Japan when he wrote Neuromancer, which was written in 1982. So here we have a North American in 1982 writing a book redolent with themes from a country he has never visited, during an era when North America was afire with fear of what the Japanese were going to do in America (this was the bubble era and Japan had just, apparently, become the largest creditor nation in the world – they were supposedly buying up American businesses and land). This, I think it’s easy to see, is a situation ripe with potential for cultural stereotypes to eclipse nuanced thinking.
It’s worth noting before we go on – and for the rest of any posts I get around to writing about this – that the author of this thesis I’m studying makes it clear at this point that his goal is not “reading cultural representation for their positive or negative (authentic or inauthentic) portrayals”, but that he is interested in examining the ways that these representations “function to reiterate, challenge, transform and/or create cultural norms”. His interest is the relationship between existing stereotypes of Japan, the way the cyberpunk texts interpret them, and how these interpretation serve to create new images (at least, that’s what I assume this means). I know a lot of (both of) my readers are eager to find examples of transparent whining leftism, so please relax – this chap is trying to do something a little more interesting than that.
So what does the introduction tell us about how race will be handled in the thesis? For a start, in the 4 pages covering “The Fluidity of Race” we don’t see the word “multiculturalism” once, even though Gibson himself states that “I’ve always lived in Vancouver … a Pacific Rim city with a lot of interaction with Japan.” Vancouver, the world’s most multicultural city, in a country with a policy of multiculturalism… it seems that this might have influenced Gibson’s views on race and his power to interpret race, or to imagine multi-racial societies. Also, isn’t Vancouver in … Canada? But the classic interpretation of cyberpunk is as an American urban myth. So for example we find this description of the relationship between America and Japan at the time:
the now obligatory Japanese reference also marks the obsession with the great Other, who is perhaps our own future rather than our past, the putative winner of the coming struggle – whom we therefore compulsively imitate, hoping that thereby the inner mind-set of the victorious other will be transformed to us along with the externals
[this is actually a quote from Jameson, a key post-modernist writer influencing our author’s text]. But is this right to apply to Gibson? If he lived in Vancouver most of his life, is this relevant? Canada is a resource exporting country, and such countries are never threatened by manufacturing countries the way that another manufacturing country (e.g., America) might be – the manufacturing countries need us so long as we have stuff in the ground. The quote as written certainly sounds like something that could be said about Phillip K Dick, or about Allied war propaganda from world war 2, but is it applicable to the mindset of a man who has “always lived” in a multicultural city as relaxed and easy to live in as Vancouver, in a resource-exporting country? I think it might be a little overwrought. And Jameson seems to be saying this about Bladerunner as much as about Gibson’s work.
This part of the introduction concludes with the statement that
in an era of globalisation, Asian Americans are becoming ubiquitous in American popular culture both as producers and consumers. Globalisation … has been accompanied by intensified transnational cultural practices and cultural hybridities in societies around the world. Thus “race and its cultural meanings remain at the core of globalizing media flows and their local receptions”
This leads to the discussion of the other big issue in cyberpunk, globalisation, but it doesn’t seem to me to put the race issue to bed. Is the representation of race in cyberpunk related to globalisation or to the triumph of multiculturalism as a cultural model, if not for everyone in the west, at least for young people from a certain cultural elite? And what does that tell us about the kinds of stereotypes that will enter the work of a man who had never visited Japan when he wrote the book? Will they be stereotypes based on outdated cultural models of Japan, or will they be a combination of the various Oriental things he saw in multicultural Vancouver (including shops, Asian cinema, visits to chinatown, art exhibitions etc.) and the hugely influential Bladerunner? If so, the stereotypes Gibson is building are being built not only from a distant, imagined Orient, but from an Orient which has plonked itself on his doorstep, modified itself to suit a relaxed, multicultural, very Western city, and presented itself to him full of late 70s and early 80s vigour.
If so, what we’re seeing here is the production of stereotypes in a very different way to that envisaged by Said in Orientalism. We’re also seeing, perhaps, the production of images of the Orient in a sub-cultural genre that may not actually be influenced very strongly by the insecurities and biasses of that great producer of modern popular culture, America. Perfect material for the development of a theory of post-modern Orientalism. But our author hasn’t mentioned multiculturalism or paid much attention to Gibson’s Canadian heritage – so is he going to miss this chance when he approaches the topic in more detail?
Only time will tell…
March 10, 2010 at 7:40 pm
I downloaded the thesis so I could read along, but haven’t started it yet. Anyway, like you I’m not entirely convinced by this line of thinking. All that you say about Gibson and Vancouver is true, but above and beyond that, Japanese people actually barely feature in Gibson’s work (at least as far as I can remember). A lot of the time the action happens in America, and when it’s in Japan its situated in the expat community. I’m not sure how this person managed to get a thesis out of this topic, but it just goes to show what a load of wank the academic study of literature is these days.
March 10, 2010 at 8:45 pm
My memory of the books is different – I remember a sense of Japanese corporate culture (imaginary, obviously, since neither Gibson nor I knew what the real culture was) hanging about the books, but thought it was due to a few key scenes and not because they were full of Japanese references. Do you remember them as having this feeling? But the thesis certainly seems to find a lot of Japan-related material in the books, for example at the point I’m reading now he says
So I think we could be wrong. He’s also discussing Bladerunner, which apparently (according to Wikipedia) cursed a whole bunch of Japanese companies with their inclusion in the movie. I’ve only read 2(?) Phillip K Dick novels, and one (The man in the High Castle, I think) had a really strong emphasis on an “imagined” Japan (that won world war 2 and traded in fake pre-war “artifacts” with Americans), so I think it’s likely Dick did have a fascination with Japan. This may have come through in the making of the movie. Many argue that Bladerunner is a pastiche of Chinese and Japanese themes (this is raised in the thesis – our author interviews Japanese subjects who watched the movie, and they think its version of Japan is weird), but this is exactly the point of Said’s Orientalism – genuinely accurate portrayals of the Orient are rare, and the nature of their inaccuracies is interesting.
Regardless of the correctness or otherwise of our memory of Gibson (and I think in this case we could be wrong), I think there is a strong current of Japanophilia in Cyberpunk (compared to other genres, particularly for their era), and I also think this concept of “post-modern orientalism” could be a valuable one (in as much as either of those concepts separately has any value – and if we’re going to dispute that we might as well give up now).
Also, thanks for reading along. I think we’ve just made this the most-read PhD Thesis in history!
April 8, 2010 at 12:19 pm
“I know a lot of (both of) my readers are eager to find examples of transparent whining leftism, so please relax”
This sort of knee-jerk defensive stance is exactly what I’d expect of a left winger waiting in line to see part 2 of Che.
You didn’t really think I was going to let the challenge pass without comment?
I’d hoped to have more to add, but I presume that’ll have to wait for you to get out of the intro and into the meat of document where I can begin my knee-jerk refusal to consider race in an intellectual fashion at all. I may even do that while sitting in Mebourne’s new (to me anyway) Japanese pub 🙂
April 8, 2010 at 1:49 pm
It will be a cold day in hell when you turn down a challenge to an argument! I’m going to try and get to the next stage of this soon, so stay tuned…