
There has been a lot of racist backlash against the decision to cast some non-white characters in the new Lord of the Rings tv series. Tolkien fanboys and fascists (a not very distorted circle on a Venn diagram, it would appear) are very angry that a few new characters – some Harfoots, Durin’s wife, a random elf – have been cast as black or brown-skinned rather than the “fair” skinned characters that Tolkien originally envisaged them as. I’ve already written on here that I think this is a good thing, and a direct confrontation with the worst part of Tolkien’s legacy, his racist theories. But now, as the show starts to get, well, boring, I’ve had more time to think about the composition of the cast, and I think that the people making this show have taken an easy road to diversity and inclusion, which is going to have the unlikely consequence of reproducing the race and sex-based power relations of modern America. I think my disappointment in their decisions and their consequences is best summarized in a simple question: why isn’t Durin IV a woman?
Durin and Disa and the shackles of domestic life
First, let’s consider all the material that has been written about Durin IV (the particular King in the show), from Appendix A of the Lord of the Rings:
There [Durin 1] lived so long that he was known far and wide as Durin the Deathless. Yet in the end he died before the Elder Days had passed, and his tomb was in Khazad-dûm; but his line never failed, and five times an heir was born in his House so like to his Forefather that he received the name of Durin. He was indeed held by the Dwarves to be the Deathless that returned; for they have many strange tales and beliefs concerning themselves and their fate in the world.
This does not specify the sex of Durin, it only uses the generic “he” to refer to all the Durins, of whom there were six. Given that Tolkien refers to all humans as “men”, and it is quite common to refer to mixed collections of men and women by the male pronoun, there’s no particularly strong reason to believe that every Durin “so like to his forefather that he received the name of Durin” had to be a man – there could have been one or two Durins who were female, and Tolkien would probably have referred to them as “he” anyway. This is what Tolkien’s fan-boys and assorted fascist hangers-on would want, they would strongly object to to the use of the “woke” “their” to refer to a mixed group of male and female characters from (for example) the race of “men”. If you think I am being facetious with this, consider the responses by D&D players to this EN World thread about choice of pronouns in D&D, which makes clear (and I remember this!) that AD&D used the masculine pronoun generically, and people responding to the question at the top of the thread include some loser saying anything else is “woke nonsense”. What do you think Tolkien would have done?

Anyway, we are dealing with poetic license here. There is no reason, given how little is written about Durin IV, that he should have been made either male or white skinned in this show: the show-makers chose to go with this decision based on a disputable fragment of a sentence in an appendix, and on the general assumption that no women could be rulers anywhere in Middle Earth (except among the elves). So, Durin IV is a white man, and his wife is a black woman. And what is his wife’s job? She cooks and cleans for him. We know this because there is a quite elegant conversation in episode 4, where Elrond is sitting in Durin’s home while Disa does stuff, and he tries to fool her into revealing where her husband has gone, and it is made very clear that she is waiting at home, minding the kids and cooking his dinner.
So there we have it: white husband black wife, black wife is a housewife. Sure, we see her do some stone-singing later, but it’s clear that she doesn’t have an actual job otherwise – she’s a housewife (she also prepared Durin’s dinner in episode 1, in case it wasn’t clear) who can sing a little when everyone’s desperate. What’s the implication here? Probably it was her job before they got married and she settled down into her domestic role.
This isn’t the only time that we see the gender roles at work in Middle Earth (or Numenor for that matter). Women are cooks, housewives, mothers and cleaners, while men are leaders and fighters. In Numenor in Episode 4 when Elendil calls for warriors to go to Middle Earth we get a general scene of the crowd and only men raise their hands to join the battle. Perhaps we don’t see this division of labour amongst the Harfoots but the Harfoots are essentially comic relief at the moment, and it’s telling to me when the only time gender roles can be reversed is among the comic relief.
What are the consequences of these decisions going to be, in terms of representation? Let’s consider the case of Galadriel.
The consequences of Galadriel’s Whiteness
Galadriel is white in this show, so painfully white she has no lips and limited facial expression. Why is she white? Because in the books we know a lot about Galadriel, and she is definitely described as fair. So the show-makers have decided to stick to the text in this case, and make her a fair-skinned maiden with no lips[1]. Why didn’t they make her black? Is there any reason that any of these characters need to stick to the descriptions in the book, other than fidelity and making them easy to identify? Now that we have established through the presence of Disa and Arondir that canon can be broken as regards skin colour, why not extend this to established characters within the canon?
There’s no reason to do this of course – we could have all the established characters keep their descriptions from the book, and then only make the new characters black or female. That’s a completely defensible choice, really, isn’t it? But what does it mean? It means that Galadriel, Elrond, Gil-Galad, Celebrimbor, Durin, Elendil and Gandalf are going to be white and only subordinate characters are going to be black. All the leaders are going to be white men and their inferiors, servants, wives, maids and sub-alterns will be black.
What an amazing coincidence! In a magical world far away with no rules to bind it, except the long ago text written by a dead English Professor, all the people in charge are male and white, and all the black people are subordinates[2]. Who could have guessed such a circumstance would arise?
This could be solved by making at least one of the major characters black. Why not Gil-Galad or Celebrimbor? Nobody gives a fuck about them! Elrond had a human mother, we could easily run with that. But no, we can’t, we have to be at least that true to the text, but instead of being fully true to the text so that all the housewives and maids and foot soldiers and subordinates are white, now some of them are black. Even Middle-Earth has red-lining, glass ceilings and a black-white pay gap!
So, at this point we are beginning to see how race and sex relations will play out in this supposedly too progressive, overly “woke” show: the leadership will be white men, women will be in the kitchen, and somehow black people will remain servants and followers of white people. If this is how the show plays out it will be, if anything, worse than the books.
Why is it that so many modern American cultural works can conceive of playing around with racial roles but can’t upend the gender conventions underlying so much of US society? And why do all their decisions reproduce current class-, race- and sex-based power relations? Why couldn’t they just have made Durin a woman?
fn1: and apparently no magic and no radiance and not really any ears, since she can disguise herself as a human simply by pulling her hair over her ears…
fn2: Except one! Miriel, who is the queen regent of Numenor, who is an actual character in Tolkien’s world (the Silmarillion I think) and who should be Queen but <em>in the books</em> has her title usurped by a man. This man is not on the scene in the show, and Elendil is about to set sail to Middle Earth (where her usurper husband does it in the books) so it’s entirely possible it will be Miriel, not her usurper husband, who is deceived by Sauron and brings about the ruin of Numenor – so the only black leadership figure in this story is going to be one who is not officially a ruler, but has taken the place in someone’s stead, and who brings about the downfall of a great race. Good choice of character from the books to make black …
October 19, 2022 at 8:01 am
Given that female dwarves are indistinguishable from male ones when clothed, how would you tell?
October 19, 2022 at 9:17 am
Well in this show they’ve made very clear that there are differences between male and female dwarves, and Durin and Disa are very distinguishable (plus, of course, there is the use of gendered pronouns, so you can tell). [The issue of gender representation in dwarves is super annoying, especially since in the hobbit Tolkien didn’t even really bother to specify much about dwarven beards …]
October 26, 2022 at 2:48 pm
Numenor had three ruling queens; the Second House of the Edain (the Haladin) were known as the House (or people, or folk) of Haleth, after a woman who had been their leader.
October 26, 2022 at 7:30 pm
This show is set after that I think, in the “reign” of Miriel, who is really just acting as a steward for her dying dad and who will be usurped by some dude with a z in his name, who will be lured to the dark side of the force by Sauron. So I think within the context of the show the general assumption I reference is reasonable. (and of course viewed only within the context of the broader lord of the rings world we know of, most kings are men).
Incidentally, are you watching this show? It’s utter shit.
October 26, 2022 at 7:38 pm
Pharazon has a z in his name. Yes, I wasn’t challenging your general point, just being an insufferable show-off about my knowledge of Tolkien trivia (I could carry on about Pharazon and Miriel here, but I won’t). No, I’m not watching the show. I didn’t watch any of the films, either. I’m confident I’d get nothing out of them, or at any rate very little.
October 26, 2022 at 9:30 pm
Choosing to make no further comment on your knowledge of Tolkien trivia (but well done!) I will say that I have been re-watching the movies in parallel with the show, something I’m thinking of writing a post about, and although it’s considered uncool in nerd circles to say this I think they are a very passionate and faithful presentation of the story. Not perfect, obviously, and not free from controversial decisions, but overall show an obvious, deep connection to the story and a genuine desire to share it with the world at the best available quality. And it’s astounding that with a budget of about a third of the Ring of Power TV show they are better in every single respect. But the thing that most struck me about the comparison of this TV show with the movies is the complete lack of interest the makers of the new show have in the books. They simply don’t show any respect for, love of or joy in the story at all. It’s terrible.
October 27, 2022 at 7:36 am
It would obviously be false to say that nobody can get anything out of the films, because it’s obvious that lots of people get a lot out of them; and I can’t say–and I’m not saying–that it’s uncool for you to be getting something out of the films, when I don’t know what you’re getting out of them and haven’t seen them myself. I admit to some level of curiosity to know more about your experience and your evaluation of the films, but even if you satisfied that curiosity (which obviously you’re under no obligation to do), I doubt I’d feel it was worth watching the films to make my own evaluation. If you do make that post you’re considering, I’ll almost certainly read it, but I don’t know how much of a sensible response I’ll be able to make.
October 27, 2022 at 9:35 am
It’s actually an interesting question why anyone watches a film of a book they’ve already read, isn’t it? I guess the main reason for watching is to see if they can present the book in a way that improves on those aspects of the book that can be improved, or to have a visual feast made out of something one enjoyed. In the case of LoTR even though I’m a big fan, it’s clear that there are aspects of pacing and description that could be improved, and parts that could be dropped (e.g. bombadil). Plus of course the sheer visceral delight of seeing a good depiction of orcs, ring wraiths etc. In terms of commenting on it, the obvious reason to review such a movie is to ask oneself whether it presents an honest and faithful version of the books to people who haven’t read them and don’t intend to, and I think that this is why it’s “uncool” in nerd circles to like the movies, because a lot of nerds think they aren’t a faithful depiction of the books (most of these critics think the Bakshi version was good, which is ridiculous on its face). I think they’re clearly a passionate, skillful attempt to make a faithful rendition of the books that will appeal to people who haven’t read them and probably won’t. I certainly know people who only read the books because they enjoyed the movies and wanted to deepen their understanding of the story and the cultural phenomenon that was Tolkien, and I think that’s a good thing.
WRT Ring of Power, I think there’s even more reason to make a good version of this, because the Silmarillion is a much harder book to read and much less entertaining, more of a biblical recounting than a pleasurable story, and a good movie maker should be able to fill in the gaps and bring those stories to life in a way that adds to the work in the books. (This, obviously, is also true of movies made on stories in the bible!) And in my judgment this TV show dismally fails to do this.
October 27, 2022 at 12:30 pm
For several years I belonged to a Book-to-Film Adaptation group–the idea was that group members would read the book, meet before the screening of the film and compare notes, and then meet again after watching the film and compare notes again.
One of the main things I have taken away from that experience is that I would rather watch a film that was a good film but not faithful to the book than a film that was faithful to the book but didn’t work as a film. The two things are not inextricably linked. You can have merit in a film without fidelity to the book.
If you wanted to sell me on the films, what you’d have to do would be to tell me about what you thought was great about the films, as films, almost as if I didn’t even know the book. (Almost as if I didn’t know, not exactly as if I didn’t know, because I do know the book.)
October 27, 2022 at 4:06 pm
well as films I think they’re just great, and I struggle to think of fantasy movies that have topped them over the past 20 years. They’re really very good, and (possibly due to the books they’re drawn from) don’t suffer from many of the issues that plague modern American movies – there’s no significant daddy issues in the main plot, the lead characters aren’t doofuses, there’s little needless tension with no payoff, and the pacing is great. In contrast Rings of Power has the misfortune of having been released at almost exactly the same time as another 10 episode fantasy series, House of the Dragon, so you can compare directly with another fantasy series and see immediately how awfully inferior it is in every way. Unfortunate for the producers, I guess, but a problem they could have solved by making a half-decent show.
October 28, 2022 at 11:39 am
Three out of the four things you’ve told me about them are just faults that they don’t have.
October 28, 2022 at 1:45 pm
Haha I’ve been forced to adopt a low bar by exposure to too many modern movies. Okay, how about, the scenery and sets are great, the action is excellent, it has good pacing, a nice balance of action, travel and interaction, great acting by main and minor characters, the relationship between the three key characters (Frodo, Sam and Gollum) is really beautifully done, the depiction of gollum is incredible, it is visually beautiful, the music is great, the camerawork is great, and every one of the key adversaries – ring wraiths, orcs, the Balrog, the weird monster outside Moria etc – are all brought to life really well. They’re really good movies!
October 28, 2022 at 6:15 pm
Have you seen Peter K Rosenthal’s review of Good Will Hunting for the Onion Film Standard?