I’ve started reading John Carter of Mars, by Edgar Rice Burroughs, in anticipation of what looks like a very fun movie, but I have to say that even though the story is interesting the writing is absolutely appalling. It’s classic Mary Sue, with a character who is just better than everyone else at everything and obviously already knows his way through the plot, as if he were in fact the writer of the story himself. It also uses the classic “tell, don’t show” error of teenage fanfiction. Reading it is a tedious exercise in admiration of a two-dimensional hero.
The basic story is simple: John Carter, ex-slave owner and “Southern Gentleman,” finds himself accidentally on Mars, where he is thrown into the middle of the ongoing conflict between two races who have been reduced to hard scrabble in a failing environment. Mars (or “Barsoom,” as the locals call it), used to be the home of a great race of human-like peoples, who slowly fell into decay as the environment of Mars failed. Another race appears to have decided to live communally on the land and, as commies are wont to do, degenerated into barbarism and cruelty. The descendants of the great race – red skinned humanoids – have great technology and are trying to save the planet, while the savages – weird buggish freaks – run around being cruel and nasty. John Carter lands amongst the savages, but immediately impresses them with his prowess at everything, and though a captive of these savages manages to get himself appointed a chieftain (through combat, of course) and is given wardenship of one of their prisoners, who of course is an extremely important member of the red-skinned people. He is also given a couple of women to look after him, and one of these just happens to be the only kind and thoughtful savage on Barsoom.
So, having accidentally disappeared from his own world, with its rich 19th century culture of slave-holding and subjugated women, where he is a much-admired and respected man, Carter finds himself on a completely alien world with different culture and language, but within a couple of seconds finds himself much-admired and respected, and lording it over a small collection of women – purely by dint of his talents, of course.
This could be a fun read, I suppose, like a kind of sexless version of Gor, but for the fact that John Carter is a tedious, insufferable braggart who is good at everything and never makes an error. And oh, how we are constantly reminded of his talents. For example:
To be held paralzyed … seems to me the last word in fearsome predicaments for a man who had ever been used to fighting for his life with all the energy of a powerful physique
or:
I do not believe that I am made of the stuff which constitutes heroes, because, in all of the hundreds of instances that my voluntary acts have placed me face to face with death, I cannot recall a single one where any alternative step to that I took occurred to me until many hours later … I have never regretted that cowardice is not optional with me
and following this up:
Fear is a relative term … but I can say without shame that if the sensations I endured during the next few minutes were fear, then may God help the coward, for cowardice is of a surety its own punishment
In case you hadn’t noticed, John Carter is a robust fighter who never feels fear and acts automatically out of a sense of duty. These quotes are from the first few chapters but Burroughs isn’t tardy about letting us all know that John Carter is the best, y’all: his manifold perfections are outlined in a foreword. But just in case you thought Carter might just be the 19th century equivalent of a great sportsman, we are also reminded that he is a consummate warrior, and a genius to boot. In training with the savages weapons, we find:
I was not yet proficient with all the weapons, but my great familiarity with similar earthly weapons made me an unusually apt pupil, and I progressed in a very satisfactory manner
Oh! The modesty! Also, within a few days of joining the savages, John Carter has befriended his watchdog in a way that no martian has ever done before, and has taught the martians better ways of managing their own mounts, and mounted combat, so that they are both better able to manage their mounts and better able to fight en masse. This despite the fact that he is unfamiliar with martian gravity and doesn’t speak their language. Not that the latter bothers him much:
in a week I could make all my wants known and understand nearly everything that was said to me. Likewise, under Sola’s tutelage, I developed my telepathic powers so that I shortly could sense practically everything that went on around me.
This, incidentally, is the entirety of the coverage that the existence of telepathy gets in this work for the first 8 or so chapters. We’ve had more sentences devoted to the production of the milk Carter drinks than to the telepathy he learns. It’s not, however, the last time that Carter gets a chance to remind us that he is a genius:
I nearly drove Sola distracted by my importunities to hasten on my education and within a few more days I had mastered the Martian tongue sufficiently well to enable me to carry on a passable conversation and to fully understand practically all that I heard
Here is an example of a conversation he could understand “within a few more days”:
In our day we have progressed to a point where such sentiments mark weakness and atavism. It will not be well for you to permit Tars Tarkas that you hold such degenerate sentiments, as I doubt that he would care to entrust such as you with the grave responsibilities of maternity
So, one week to learn how to say “I need to take a leak,” another few more days to get to the point of understanding an overheard conversation about “atavism.” Also, telepathy in one sentence. And nowhere in this time period is there a hint, even a single hint, of homesickness, or any kind of emotional trauma at having teleported out of a cave in Arizona to a field on Mars. Do you feel small yet? Or are you, more likely, bored stiff with this character who can do everything and anything?
In addition to being a robust Southern Gentleman who can learn martian in a day, Carter also seems to have remarkable luck to take exactly the right path in any situation. He hears someone behind him, so instead of attacking, he jumps, which impressed his attackers rather than getting him killed; he gives his horse its head in the darkness, which is just as well because it leads him up just the right path to escape the Indians; he makes a guess about the best way to impress the natives and – lo! – it was the right guess. Within about a chapter of the start of the adventure it has been well-impressed upon the reader that, no matter what, Carter is not at risk of significant injury, failure or death. As the reader, you have nothing invested in the story at all – it’s not like Carter is going to ever have to overcome a failing or character flaw (he has none), there’s no sense in which his plight is the same as yours would be if you ended up on Mars, and there’s never a feeling that he will make a bad choice, even by accident.
This apathy is further entrenched by the narrative flow, in which Burroughs tells us everything we need to know about the society, environment and structure of Mars long before Carter himself finds out the details. Rather than discovering the mysteries of Mars in the flow of the adventure, we’re told everything about a setting, person, circumstance or technology as soon as we encounter it. The phrase “As I later learned,” or “as I was to discover,” appears constantly in the text – maybe a couple of times every chapter, and always expounds on things we could quite happily find out ourselves with a bit of time. Thus, we only know we are somewhere mysterious because we are told we are on Mars: from the very moment of his arrival there, Carter’s narrative breaks the mystery of the planet with constant references to things that neither he nor the reader know. We even get a lesson in Martian demographics in the second chapter of his encounter with the savages, something that really could have waited to be revealed to us later in a conversation with someone.
This kind of adventure writing is so tedious as to be almost unbearable. The plot itself is interesting – I want to find out about Mars and the society Burroughs has created, and I want to see where the story goes. It’s a really good idea that, in the hands of a decent writer, would make a really cool story. I’m guessing, then, that the movie is going to be good. But the book – thoroughly forgettable so far. It reminds me of John Wyndham’s pompous academic Mary Sues, who always take a young woman under their wing and teach her the harsh realities of the world, while she constantly thanks them in breathless wonder at their wisdom; or the later books of Dune, after whats-his-face becomes a god and surmounts every challenge by simply being himself. No challenge, no threat, no sympathy with a human character, no need for character development and no sense that the character will ever grow as a person through adversity. Of course, this may change later, but at the moment it’s looking like the writing is going to be drier than the surface of Mars.
So, unless you’re feeling really patient, I can’t recommend John Carter of Mars. Is the rest of Burroughs’s work this badly written?
January 13, 2012 at 5:40 pm
Who cares? It’s pulp. It rattles along, you want to find out what happens next all the way through, and you get exactly the amount of information you need to know what’s going on. The hero is exactly as three dimensional as he needs to be for the story, and the plot is like a shark – it just goes from A to B and don’t bother me with details. It’s not a masterpiece of SF literature, no, but it’s a masterpiece of pulp.
Of course, all that assumes that you like pulp SF. If you don’t, then you won’t like this book. The only thing you can’t say is that it’s badly written: it’s extremely well written as an example of its genre. Burroughs knew who he was writing for, and he targeted his prose style perfectly.
He’s in that category of Stephen King, Armistead Maupin, Charles Dickens even: writers who from the beginning were churning out stories to make money. The market forced efficiency and populism on him, like it did them, and that affected his style. You either like it or you don’t, but it’s not the case that he wrote badly.
January 13, 2012 at 6:57 pm
Good points, Noisms, but I only partially agree. Sure, characters can be two-dimensional and over the top in pulp, and the narrative only needs to serve as a prop for the plot, but pulp can still be well written. I haven’t read a great deal of the classic stuff, but I’ve read all of Conan and Howard is consistently good. Conan is not a perfect character morally or intellectually, and you have a real feeling that he’s under the cosh at times. In this book you just can’t find anything wrong with Carter, and you can’t sympathize with him emotionally, personally or through the straitened circumstances he finds himself in. I think this is actually an important element of pulp: even though you know your hero is going to survive, you have to be on the edge of your seat for him. Me, I’m lounging back here with a beer trying to resist the urge to skip the details. That ain’t pulp, that’s pulpable.
The plot is also not like a shark – although it goes from A to B it frequently stops to bother me with the details. In one chapter I’m regaled with an analysis of comparative survival rates, and a detailed description of Martian agriculture, in the midst of trying to work out whether Carter is a prisoner or a guest. That is a definite case of being bothered by details. The prose style is awkward and bombastic, and Carter’s (hyper) authoritative voice frequently interjects to give us details about someone’s personality that we couldn’t possibly have learnt for ourselves, rather than waiting for a chance to show us. There’s a telling point, for example, where some old savage female, Shakoja or something, is described as a bullying and cruel person. About two pages later, we’re given a scene where she is bullying and cruel. Perhaps the commentary could have waited and we could have worked it out for ourselves? If George Fraser or Ursula leGuin wrote this book, about 70% of it would be stripped out. In fact, comparing Flashman and Carter is instructive: Flashman is a character who survives more scrapes than an okonomiyaki spatula, but still we are continually aware of his flaws so that his ingenious use of his few special skills makes him all the more enjoyable as a protagonist.
The Mary Sue aspect is really poor too. The language particularly pissed me off, and there’s an easy out for the author: he needs his hero to learn language in a week, which is impossible. But the aliens have telepathy. So why not use this to introduce a weakness to the character and make Sola genuinely useful: “I’ve never had a talent for languages, French eluded me despite the scolding of my governess, and even though I desperately needed to learn their wretched tongue quickly, its alien logic and strange pronunciation eluded me – until Sola took pity on me and began teaching me telepathically. If only my governess had been as kind as Sola! What good fortune that I should find such a unique gem in this rough and harsh world!” etc. But no, Sola – like every other character in this story – is just a prop to be used to show us how cool Carter is.
I think you’re here engaging in a common practice of readers of fantasy (I do it too, but am really trying not to): the soft bigotry of low expectations. We’re so used to the fantasy/sci-fi industry pumping out crap that we start making excuses for the inexcusable. Just because something is High Fantasy or Pulp doesn’t mean it has to be bad, and there are lots of authors out there who can prove otherwise (e.g., Tolkien and Howard). Why settle for less?
January 13, 2012 at 10:11 pm
I read the entire Mars series as a teenager and loved them.
A few years ago I downloaded them from Project Gutenberg (hooray for public domain!) and experienced much of what you describe above. Not only did I know that Carter would win because I’d read them before, but he’d win because he has plot armor a mile thick. I got bored before I finished the first book.
You do have to give the story a few handicaps for being serial pulp. The novel isn’t how this was originally written – at a chapter an episode, the reader *does* need to be reminded that Carter is awesome (in case this is the first chapter they’ve read), and hopefully without wasting a lot space doing so (so you can move on).
I think as a teenager I didn’t notice this because I was primarily interested in the good things about these books – action, world-building, fantasy escapism, distressed damsels and mighty heroes.
(more later)
January 13, 2012 at 10:53 pm
I don’t know how it’s going to turn out but so far I like the distressed damsel – she has the promise of being quite feisty, despite the implications of the cover art. I’ll be disappointed if she’s a squealer. However, this from the wikipedia page on Tarzan says I’m going to be satisfied:
Plot armor is a good description of what is going on with Carter. It’s no fun. And I’m not sure I credit the serialisation as an excuse- Tess of the D’Urbervilles was serialized 40 years before this book and didn’t suffer from any of these problems.
Looking forward to more of your opinions, Fanguad.
January 14, 2012 at 12:03 am
[Digression: I absolutely hated Tess of the D’Urbervilles. I didn’t realize it was serialized. She’s the exact opposite of John Carter – nothing bad can happen to him, and nothing good can happen to her.]
When I was a teenager, I think the idea of a wish-fulfillment character who was invincible and awesome and got the girl was a lot more appealing than a character that I, as a nerdy, unpopular teenager, could identify with.
The stories, the villains, the non-central characters – I think these are what I remember most about the Mars books. John Carter just applies his awesomesauce to problems and they go away – the smart villains (and there are some) set up situations where straightforward application of awesomesause doesn’t make Carter win. Of course, he still wins in the end, but the plots get a bit more complicated (as they often do with serials). ERB’s descriptions of fights is also enjoyable, even if the end result is predictable. I guess my overall opinion is that there is a lot to enjoy in these books, if you can look past the flaws.
Several of the books feature main characters who are not John Carter. There are several other Supermen main characters, but one features a “normal” guy, and one has a female main character.
Regarding ERB’s depiction of women… definitely sexist by today’s standards, but a lot of them has just as much character as the men. There’s always an element of “damsel in distress” but they carry themselves with dignity. Aside from John Carter, the character I remember most vividly from the entire series is Valla Dia, the DiD from “The Master Mind of Mars.”
From an RPG viewpoint: Barsoom would make an awesome world to adventure in. Lots of ancient ruins, lots of kingdoms at war (or nearly so) with each other, vast stretches of unexplored wilderness, a bunch of different races. John Carter is Barsoom’s Elminster, so you’d need to make sure he didn’t upstage the PCs.
January 14, 2012 at 5:41 pm
I get the “plot armour” point, but to me that’s all part of the charm. I re-read A Princess of Mars earlier this year and it made me smile, because it’s so ridiculous but so full of brio at the same time. (And if you’re feeling postmodern about it you can read it as a kind of Baron Munchhausen tall tale and it works just as well.)
Like I said, it all depends on personal taste, and I suppose what your definition of bad writing is. Burroughs just gets the job done, and that efficiency is admirable – it’s good writing in my view. The little info-dump tangents about Mars I could do without (the best fantasy and SF never stops to tell you about the setting), but I understand why they’re there: the reader needs to know something to understand the plot, so Burroughs tells him.
As for Tess of the D’Urbervilles – ugh. Give me naked red women and white apes any day.
January 14, 2012 at 8:10 pm
Noisms, I guess the plot armour would be more charming if Carter weren’t also a pompous know-it-all who is perfect at everything and constantly reminds us of this fact. One or other is bearable, but when you get both it’s way over the top. I will, from now on, try to view it as a Munchhausen tale and see if that helps. Although maybe I have been, because I am still reading it and for all its manifest flaws I am enjoying it. I’m hating the gender relations at the moment but I do like the way the women are depicted, too, and I’m wondering actually if there might be a phenomenon in pulp fantasy: that it’s ahead of its time in its depiction of women. Haven’t read enough to say.
To dredge up a point from your previous comment, I don’t think this work in any way compares (in skill and execution) to Stephen King, who, when he is on fire, is actually pretty good. Consider The Running Man, which manages to get a tight plot, a gripping adventure, and the details of a very different near-future world, with a flawed but believable main character who definitely does not have plot armour, all in a very small book. I’m definitely not a fan of Stephen King, but if you want to talk about writing for money and doing it well I think he can be quite a good example (also the first book in the Gunslinger series and Misery were very well crafted).
As I was reading this I was wondering about whether actually the problems of novels like John Carter represent a flaw of the publishing industry rather than the writer, per se, in that perhaps editing as a profession has improved vastly in the intervening 70 years. My partner is an editor, and her first criticism of books like Lord of the Rings or this one is not of the author but of the editors – “he needed a good editor[1].” I wonder if actually that aspect of the industry has improved significantly, and if Edgar Rice Burroughs were writing now he would be given some simple pointers to clean up the work.
I agree about naked red women and white apes over Tess, but Thomas Hardy is a very good writer and he managed to write a very normal novel in serialized form. My point was only that writing for money is no defense against accusations of being shite, not that everyone should enjoy Tess more than Carter. (I do like Thomas Hardy[2], but I understand he’s not everyone’s cup of tea, and he does seem to divide all his readers very radically).
—
fn1: Her opinion of later Harry Potter books: somebody got famous didn’t she, and her editors couldn’t stand up to her any more…
fn2: This could partly be because he writes about Wessex in a way that only someone who lived there could, and since my childhood years in England were spent in Wessex I find his descriptions of the English countryside quite beautiful[3].
fn3: Probably also the only things I enjoyed about DH Lawrence
January 15, 2012 at 4:41 pm
I read most of Burroughs as a teenager, but I don’t want to go back. Whereas I do with Dickens. And I see Dicken’s characters on the street or the bus all the time, but I never meet Burroughs ones.
Shorter Hardy – obscure rural person lives miserable life. It’s educational, but it’s not fun. The literary equivalent of algebra.
September 27, 2012 at 1:21 am
Without having yet read your article, let me say: I googled ‘John Carter Mary Sue’ after reading the first two books and continually rolling my eyes over the main characters Mary Sueishness. I found this article. I don’t think there is any better example for a male Mary Sue (or Gary Stu) than John Carter. He fits the bill in every single respect, right down to the author’s obvious and clumsy devices of making other people look dumb to make John Carter look better.
September 27, 2012 at 10:14 am
That’s funny Stefanie. Did you find many complaints about the issue when you googled it?
February 5, 2014 at 10:42 pm
Do you issue with John being such a Mary/Gary Sue though?
April 26, 2015 at 9:41 pm
I just started the first book myself and googled “John Carter Gary Stu” to see if things would get any better. Thank you for saving me a good bit of time.
I have to disagree with Noisms about pulp. True there are at times stereotypes of women and people of color but the stories are often fairly good.
For an example of good classic pulp, try looking up the first novel of The Shadow. The Shadow himself is quite mysterious and impenetrable but his agents are very human. For example, Harry Vincent meets The Shadow during an aborted suicide attempt.
Also female characters are portrayed as intelligent and not beyond drawing a gun and providing for their own defense.
April 27, 2015 at 10:02 am
Thanks for your comment Melody. I’m happy if my review can save someone the trouble of slogging through several stories before they realize the Mary Sue-ing doesn’t end. I must confess I haven’t read much pulp and I’m not sure if I would even know what the boundaries of the genre are, but I dislike making judgments about the quality of an entire genre, since most have quality writing in them. Perhaps I’ll give The Shadow a go!