There seems to be a lot of nerdrage going on at the moment about the new Hobbit movie, and the depiction of the Dwarves who form the bulk of the characters. The Dwarves actually seem pretty cool to me (you can see them here) and I particularly like Fili and Kili because they actually represent an attempt to present Dwarves as something more than just fat, bearded fighters. They are Dwarven rogues, which is exactly what the book tells us they are. Man, how’s that for textual interpretation?
Leading the charge against this terrible misrepresentation of Tolkien’s work is Grognardia, who complains about Fili and Kili’s non-dwarvishness here and disputes some others here and here. But he also presents us with an alternative “vision” of The Hobbit‘s Dwarves, in the old Rankin-Bass version of The Hobbit, which thankfully I’ve never seen. Looking at these screen captures, I see only The Eternal Jew, and contra Grognardia’s title for this post, there is no “variation” here. The Rankin-Bass version of this book presents us with 6 Dwarves who are exactly the same except for their cloaks and hats, and then it gives us Fili and Kili. But amongst those 6 we see the classic hook-nosed, suspicious-looking Jew. They have exactly the same faces. It’s like a caricature from a Nazi pamphlet.
Which is interesting, because wikipedia tells me that Tolkien based his Dwarves on mediaeval representations of Jews. How fascinating that they adopted the negative characteristics of “being gold-hungry, overly proud and occasionally officious.” Sound familiar to anyone? Plus of course their women-folk are hidden from view, they have access to secret lore (Golems, anyone?) and they are a very insular race.
This is another, classic example of Tolkien’s habit of racial determinism. The Dwarves are the worst of the bunch, in this regard – Middle Earth has half-elves but no half-Dwarves, in fact it’s not even clear if Dwarves can breed with non-Dwarves. This is exactly consistent with common views of Judaism at the time he wrote the novel, as an insular and secretive racially determined religion that admits no outsiders and cherishes its secret lore. Now, we know that Tolkien had a generally positive view of Jews (or at least, of their intellectual and cultural achievements) but in writing this kind of racial determinism he is subscribing to the politics of his era without dissent. The Dwarves of the Hobbit and the Lord of the Rings are a classic example of scientific racism.
Obviously Tolkien has no responsibility for the way that some stupid Americans decided to interpret his racial determinism, but it’s refreshing that Jackson has chosen to widen the range of cultures from which he draws inspiration for the appearance of the Dwarves. If we’re really lucky, he’ll even find a way to make their personalities less racially determined, and make some small effort to break down the kind of scientific racism that drives so much of “high” fantasy. And I bet that if he does the fanboys will squeal.
July 18, 2011 at 8:49 am
Are you sure you want to jump straight to racial theories about Jews as Tolkien’s inspiration for dwarves instead of his love for Norse myths? Noting that European stories about Dwarves are noted as being influenced by Jewish images [1].
Even if you want to posit a link between Jews and Dwarves, you have to either 1) prove that Tolkien was aware of these links and therefore racist, or b) argue that unknowingly basing your stores on other, racist, stories means you’re being racist too.
a) suggests that Tolkien wasn’t racist, but was a victim of other’s racism tainting the pool he drew from.
b) suggests that everyone who plays D&D or reads high fantasy books (and their derivatives) is racist.
Of course, if you want to point to the wikipedia entry and state that Tolkien knew exactly what he was doing by making the dwarves a Jewish metaphor, you should also quote the line “The dwarves taking Bilbo out of his complacent existence has been seen as an eloquent metaphor for the “impoverishment of Western society without Jews.””. As that suggests that (as you allow) Tolkien was running counter to the prevailing racist norms, and suggests that at the very least he was part of the evolution towards modern anti-racist sentiment. That makes LotR a progressive tract from an earlier era, much like your blog will be regarded in centuries to come.
So let me be the first to damn you for your inability to see past your racist/speciest blinders! Congratulations! You’ve become a “text” that people are “deconstructing” and finding you fail to measure up to standards you didn’t even know existed π
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alberich
July 18, 2011 at 9:10 am
It’s possible that he was looking for a model for a “good” race that wasn’t “pure” or had “flaws” and that’s where the Jews fitted in his own racial categories (see e.g. that letter of his where he implies that he thinks Jews are of superior intelligence). The wikipedia entry suggests that he moved the Dwarves from a Nordic mythological basis (in the Silmarillion, where they were largely evil) to a mediaeval representation of the Jews (in The Hobbit). If so one guesses that he must have significantly adjusted the source material before incorporation, since I don’t think many mediaeval representations of the Jews were particularly positive. But note that he retained their “gold-hungry” and greedy ways – which could also have been an accident, of retaining some nordic mythological flaws. But then, it’s possible that the Jews in mediaeval cultural representation were at least partly a manifestation of older, pagan stories about Dwarves and goblins, isn’t it?
My guess is that Tolkien was largely thinking of the perceived positive elements of Jewish culture (literary learning, craft, etc.) and just put in a few of the stronger negative images (greed, insularity) as part of the package without too much thought (or because that was the race he was looking for).
But my purpose (as ever, I have to say this) is not to prove that Tolkien was or wasn’t racist. It’s to point out that the book contains scientific racist ideals cut from whole cloth, and the Dwarves are a good example of that. Whatever his motivations, the report that Tolkien fashioned a race around the central bogeyman of early 20th century scientific racism lends itself nicely to the theory that he wasn’t creating his ideology of racially-determined traits by accident; but that’s largely irrelevant to the outcome – that here we have a highly insular race that may not even be physically capable of breeding with others, and bears many of the classic, stereotypical properties of Jews (good and bad) as perceived at the time Tolkien was writing. In fact, his Dwarves contain one significant departure from mediaeval ideology about Jews that is extremely relevant in the context of 20th century racism: their inherent traits were biological, whereas the anti-semites of a previous age saw the traits as purely religious. You can convert a 15th-century Jew to christianity and thus eliminate their worst negative traits; you can’t convert a Dwarf because their stubbornness, pride and gold-hunger are innate, somehow carried down from their fathers. This small additional factor in the model was key to scientific racism, because it lends itself to eugenic, rather than cultural, solutions to the “Dwarven problem.” The races don’t mix, you see. They have to be exterminated – the common view of Aragorn and the Orcs.
July 18, 2011 at 9:41 am
As an aside, are there even Dwarven women? My vague memories of the start of the race at the hands of one of the Valar was the smith god created 7 inital fathers of the dwarven race.
If so, that’d explain the no interbreeding. While also providing positive role models for modern gay couples. [1]
[1] You too could leave your child a pile of gold big enough for a dragon to sleep on!
July 18, 2011 at 6:29 pm
PlAy nIcE nErDs!!
July 20, 2011 at 8:51 am
What? I haven’t even gotten to my theory that dwarves aren’t based off Jews. I’d like to postulate that instead, what happened was Jewish culture was based off a poorly translated series of Norse myths.
Now do the primary research with 12th century texts to prove me wrong! π
August 3, 2011 at 6:56 am
You’re still beating this dead horse? This one in particular makes you look more than a little crazy.
On the breeding issue, there’s a good reason why dwarves can’t interbreed with elves or humans – they were created by a different creator. The story is actually quite a touching one. Once again I find myself in the position of urging you to actually read what you’re critiquing (interesting that you accuse nerds of failing to do this elsewhere in your Hobbit commentaries….).
August 3, 2011 at 9:00 pm
Yes Noisms, I’m still beating this dead horse. In this case I’m pointing out that the race Tolkien based on Jews has taken on the stereotypical traits of the mediaeval Jew, but combined them with the modern (for him) concept of the biologically determined Jew. This puts his work, once again, squarely in the middle of the scientific racism of his time.
I don’t think, incidentally, that Tolkien ever stated clearly whether Dwarves can interbreed with humans. Hence the “it’s not clear that…” I’m happy for my suspicions to be confirmed if you have the quote, but it’s not important – the ambiguity of their relations with humans is part of the parallel with their jewishness, but a complete inability to breed simply places them more closely in line with the anti-semitism of the 30s.
Once again, you jump straight to the gotcha, and land short.
August 4, 2011 at 9:05 am
Unless you’re making the argument that Tolkien believed that Jews physically couldn’t breed with people of other races, I’m not sure what this comment is about.
It’s never made clear that Dwarves can’t breed with humans, but you’d have to assume they can’t because they come from different ‘material’, so to speak. They were created by Aule, one of the Valar, in secret. So their origin is different to elves and men, who were made by Iluvatar. This is why they can’t breed with elves or men.
Why this places them “closely in line with the anti-semitism of the 30s” is anybody’s guess… I extrapolate from your arguments that you seem to think that Tolkien is mapping dwarves onto Jews and saying that since dwarves can’t breed with humans it’s akin to saying that Jewishness is biologically determined QED Jews can’t breed with non-Jews?
But hang about… Weren’t you also once saying that black people = orcs? But orcs can breed with humans. So where does that leave us?
Oh right, it leaves us nowhere, because it’s a fantasy world and not supposed to be allegorical and your argument is just a tissue of assertions based on nothing in the source material.
Incidentally, Tolkien did say that parts of his dwarves were influenced by Jewish culture. But then again he said that hobbits were influenced by English culture. That horrible racist! He’s saying all English people are short and fat with hairy feet! I’ll never read his books again.
January 17, 2012 at 7:28 pm
Why are you so quick to jump the gun?
You must have missed this in the article:
Before he wrote The Hobbit “Tolkien was inspired by the dwarves of Norse myths and dwarves of traditional European fairy-tales (such as those of the Brothers Grimm), from whom his Dwarves take their characteristic affinity with mining, metalworking, crafting and avarice.” to quote the article.
His original dwarves were always depicted negatively and these negative traits can simply be traced to sources as old as the Norse. Only in The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings did positive depictions arise and only then was he inspired by Hebrew/Jewish history and culture – and every time he explained this he says nothing about Jew gold, but alludes to their long history and ancient culture.
If you had carefully studied the issue in the author’s actual writings instead of summaries by someone on the internet you would find that he never spoke what you’re making him out to have. You’re building a completely different structure out of the same Legos than what is pictured on the box.
Also, show us where dwarf facial features which match Jewish stereotypes are detailed in the book. One or two have longer noses than usual, but even Gandalf has one too, and nobody’s is hooked. Beards? That alone won’t cut it.
January 17, 2012 at 9:05 pm
agrimensor, are you saying that the dwarves are not gold-hungry and proud? I think you have have a really idiosyncratic reading of the silmarillion to get that out of it. If you don’t like the wikipedia source, try the Tolkien gateway, which has repeated references to the character of the Dwarves.
Also note that Tolkien’s inspiration for the Dwarves is said to have changed – his first and second Age dwarves were slightly different to his third age dwarves, which are based on mediaeval representations of Jews. This includes their diaspora, secret language and culture, etc. I noted this in the post, and it seems to be a fairly well-understood fact. There’s even an interview with Tolkien on youtube where he says that the Dwarven language was intended to be a semitic one.
As for “show us where dwarf facial features which match Jewish stereotypes are detailed in the book,” I didn’t say that. I said that the Rankin and Bass cartoon depicts them in this way.
August 25, 2014 at 8:52 am
as a jew you offend me with this bull shit
August 25, 2014 at 10:12 am
Thanks for your comment, Nancy. Would you care to explain what about it offends you?