Tonight I watched live videos of Led Zeppelin at their peak, and the official video for Deep Purple’s Child in Time. It’s interesting to watch Robert Plant’s stage persona because it is simultaneously powerfully masculine and sexual, but also coquettishly feminine and camp. For those of us who grew up after the ’70s it’s hard I think to understand how deeply transgressive metal presentations of masculinity were, though the Deep Purple video gives some hint as to the shocked response of ordinary society at the time. The men in these early bands were constructing a new vision for themselves and men generally, and a new ideal of a social order, one which I think in retrospect needs to be seen as much more than just spandex-and-weed nihilism, but as a real (and largely unconscious) attempt to drag the sexual, religious and political radicalism of the English enlightenment into the modern world. I think the only band who actually realized and understood this visionary ideal were Iron Maiden, who are the conscious and willful inheritors of William Blake, but I think the other bands of that era – primarily the British masters, but in their footsteps the American and European legends – were setting about the same project, though sometimes doing it more from a classically romantic rather than strictly enlightenment vision. In amongst the drugs, the sex and the trashed hotel rooms it’s easy to lose sight of the fundamental vision that these men were trying to put forward to the world, a vision of peace, personal religious mysticism and sexual freedom that the world was not ready for, just as it was not ready for and ultimately failed to realize these exact same goals when they were put forward 200 years earlier by Blake and his contemporaries.
I have read that the English Enlightenment is often overlooked by scholars, and that many people don’t even realize there was a separate enlightenment happening in England, but that it had some of the most radical and visionary ideals of any of the enlightenment thinkers. Certainly William Blake was a powerful spokesperson for sexual liberty and political and religious freedom, and it was through the ideals of people like Blake and Wollstonecraft that the Romantics got their chance to rewrite the cultural landscape. I’ve said before on this blog that I think heavy metal is a part of Britain’s mainstream cultural tradition, but in this post I want to go further and say that metal was not just grounded in and drawing upon British cultural history, but was a direct continuation – through Victorian figures like Swinburne – of the radical ideas of the English enlightenment. This is why we find Bruce Dickinson singing Jerusalem at Canterbury Cathedral, and Led Zeppelin’s Stairway to Heaven rich with lyrics referencing the faerie and pagan dreams of Chaucer, Blake and Keats. It’s no coincidence that these men were also challenging masculine ideals of the time, wearing their hair long and singing and acting like women, because the redefinition of sexual liberty and sexual roles was an important part of the English enlightenment. I think it’s also no coincidence that the foremost bands, like Deep Purple and Metallica, lent themselves so easily to classical music, because they were themselves drawing on a musical tradition grounded in opium highs and romanticism that they could be easily adapted back to, and have shown themselves very amenable to.
Amongst all the modern strands of music, I think heavy metal is simultaneously the most conservative, because it fails to stray outside of the parameters set down by the classical musicians of 200 years ago, though it may sound radically different to them. It also confines itself to noble themes and the grandiose and political, studiously avoiding the personal and local themes of folk, hip hop, rock and pop; while they focus on talking about themselves and their relationships metal insists on regurgitating the age-old constants of religion, death and war. But it simultaneously describes new modes of sexual liberty, presents masculinity in a new and very camp style, sneers at the madness of modern politics and does the whole thing while hurtling through a classic opium-induced haze. Rather than being seen as the decline and fall of modern civilization, I think metal needs to be seen as the periodic revitalization and restoration of enlightenment values, a powerful and radical push back against the stultifying sameness of modernity and the growing conservatism of post-war art. Metal is also a sign that the enlightenment was not a phase the west went through, but is a constant spirit of restoration and reinvigoration that has been running through western culture for the last 500 years. And what better flag bearer for that spirit of restless change than Iron Maiden, Megadeth and Slayer??
January 4, 2015 at 9:11 pm
Is this an endorsement of the Tory’s or a denunciation of Metallica?
More seriously, I recall a uni politics subject which read “On Liberty” by John Stuart Mill [1] and I remember that as I read it being blown away by first a powerful call to personal freedom written centuries before my birth [2] and secondly by a rapid retreat as the visionary author abandoned all his logic to shoehorn his arguments to support an existing culture.
My primary lesson from the book wasn’t anything to do with liberty. It was “When your logic leads you somewhere, don’t retreat.” Perhaps the message we should take from musical traditions (be it classical or metal) is that we can cling to the core elements that make us us without needing to tie ourselves to concepts that have been outgrown. John Stuart Mill’s text would certainly have benefited from a transformation a la heavy metal.
And on the topic of Heavy Metal, why the hell isn’t there an anime called Heavy Metal about rockers who pilot giant mecha? I mean, clearly there are anime about rockers who pilot giant mecha, but what is Japan up to missing this naming opportunity? Could you please speak to them for me?
[1] Seems to post-date the English Enlightenment based on a quick Google.
[2] Defined by the lecturer as being left wing, because by her definition everything that wasn’t facism was left wing (seriously, apparently the right wing only read books by Mussolini [3]). I’m pretty sure I actually lost knowledge on the left/right definitions in that class.
[3] And maybe Hitler. She didn’t say, but it was pretty strongly implied.
January 4, 2015 at 9:34 pm
Rats. The Internet preserves my grammar errors like dinosaur blood eaten by mosquitoes awaiting a profit driven geneticist with poor consequence projections.
Tory’s = Tories. Tory does not own anything. Because he/she is a penniless bum.
January 4, 2015 at 10:42 pm
I endorse Tory’s…
I think metal bands like Suicidal Tendencies strongly endorse the idea of never retreating from the ideals your logic leads you to; this is the fundamental principle they describe as “being suicidal”, which doesn’t mean being suicidal at all but means not giving up your personal principles. I remember being at a gig of theirs in 1996 and chanting “I’m suicidal” to their call, after the lead singer gave a little speech about this very idea. But don’t be too hard on JS Mill; I haven’t read him but my understanding is that he and his peers were writing radical ideas at a time that their society hadn’t yet developed many of the principles (harm reduction, licensing, the welfare state) that gave them the ability to properly handle problems such as drug addiction, poverty and unemployment. My understanding is that much of modern public health principles are built on his ideals, but it would have been hard for him to reconcile his basic principles with the world he saw around him. I wonder how he dealt with the fact that his society’s wealth was built on robbing the people of the colonies? There’s a research topic for me … My impression is that JS Mill was a strong believer in the suffragette cause, but the suffragettes were not comfortable with principles of absolute freedom where it concerned drug abuse and the rights of women to security of family life. My guess is he had to reconcile the realities of women’s situation in Victorian England with his ideals, and some walking back had to occur.
In contrast, Jimmy Paige “dated” a 14 year old girl, something the English enlightenment wasn’t too fussed about, and presumably his principles of sexual freedom weren’t challenged by notions of consent. I guess being moral is just easier when you’re metal …
Final Fantasy was metal wasn’t it? But no mecha, I guess …